Senators launch a cross-party effort to end stock trading by lawmakers
[January 16, 2026]
By JOEY CAPPELLETTI
WASHINGTON (AP) — Two senators from opposite parties are joining forces
in a renewed push to ban members of Congress from trading stocks, an
effort that has broad public support but has repeatedly stalled on
Capitol Hill.
Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and Republican Sen.
Ashley Moody of Florida on Thursday plan to introduce legislation, first
shared with The Associated Press, that would bar lawmakers and their
immediate family members from trading or owning individual stocks.
It's the latest in a flurry of proposals in the House and the Senate to
limit stock trading in Congress, lending bipartisan momentum to the
issue. But the sheer number of proposals has clouded the path forward.
Republican leaders in the House are pushing their own bill on stock
ownership, an alternative that critics have dismissed as watered down.
“There’s an American consensus around this, not a partisan consensus,
that members of Congress and, frankly, senior members of administrations
and the White House, shouldn’t be making money off the backs of the
American people,” Gillibrand said in an interview with the AP on
Wednesday.
Bipartisan support but no consensus
Trading of stock by members of Congress has been the subject of ethics
scrutiny and criminal investigations in recent years, with lawmakers
accused of using the information they gain as part of their jobs — often
not known to the public — to buy and sell stocks at significant profit.
Both parties have pledged to stop stock trading in Washington in
campaign ads, creating unusual alliances in Congress.
The bill being introduced by Gillibrand and Moody is a version of a
House bill introduced last year by Reps. Chip Roy, a Republican from
Texas, and Seth Magaziner, a Democrat from Rhode Island. That proposal,
which has 125 cosponsors, would ban members of Congress from buying or
selling individual stocks altogether.
Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida tried to bypass party
leadership and force a vote on the bill. Her push with a discharge
petition has 79 of the 218 signatures required, the majority of them
Democrats.
House Republican leaders are supporting an alternative bill that would
prohibit members of Congress and their spouses from buying individual
stocks but would not require lawmakers to divest from stocks they
already own. It would mandate public notice seven days before a lawmaker
sells a stock. The bill advanced in committee Wednesday — which Luna
called “a win” — but its prospects are unclear.
Magaziner and other House Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
of New York, wrote in a joint statement Wednesday that they “are
disappointed that the bill introduced by Republican leadership today
fails to deliver the reform that is needed.”
[to top of second column]
|
The Senate bill from Gillibrand and Moody would give lawmakers 180
days to divest their individual stock holdings after the bill takes
effect, while newly elected members would have 90 days from being
sworn in to divest. Lawmakers would be prohibited from trading and
owning certain other financial assets, including securities,
commodities and futures.
“The American people must be able to trust that their elected
officials are focused on results for the American people and not
focused on profiting from their positions,” Moody wrote in response
to a list of questions from the AP.
The president would be exempt
The legislation would exempt the president and vice president, a
carveout likely to draw criticism from some Democrats. Similar
objections were raised last year over a bill that barred members of
Congress from issuing certain cryptocurrencies but did not apply to
the president.
Gillibrand said the president “should be held to the same standard”
but described the legislation as “a good place to start.”
“I don’t think we have to allow the perfect to be the enemy of the
good,” Gillibrand said. “There’s a lot more I would love to put in
this bill, but this is a consensus from a bipartisan basis and a
consensus between two bodies of Congress.”
Moody, responding to written questions, wrote that Congress has the
“constitutional power of the purse” so it's important that its
members don't have “any other interests in mind, financial or
otherwise.”
“Addressing Members of Congress is the number one priority our
constituents are concerned with,” she wrote.
Making a law or campaign fodder?
It remains to be seen if the bill will reach a vote in the Senate. A
similar bill introduced by Gillibrand and GOP Sen. Josh Hawley of
Missouri in 2023 never advanced out of committee.
Still, the issue has salience on the campaign trail. Moody is
seeking election to her first full term in Florida this year after
being appointed to her seat when Marco Rubio became secretary of
state. Gillibrand chairs the Senate Democrats’ campaign arm.
“The time has come," Gillibrand said. “We have consensus, and
there’s a drumbeat of people who want to get this done.”
All contents © copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved |
