Pentagon says the firing squad execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal
Malik Hasan will be livestreamed
[October 09, 2026]
By KONSTANTIN TOROPIN, ERIC TUCKER and CLAUDIA LAUER
WASHINGTON (AP) — The firing squad execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal
Malik Hasan will be livestreamed, the Pentagon said Thursday, a stunning
revelation about plans for the first military execution in more than 65
years after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had described it as being
“public.”
The Army announced this week that the execution would take place at Fort
Hood on Dec. 3 after Hasan was convicted of killing 13 people and
injuring 32 others in a shooting at the military base in 2009.
Hegseth, speaking to the conservative TV outlet Real America’s Voice on
Wednesday, said, “We’ll make sure that people are able to watch it, that
it’s public.” Officials in the Pentagon clarified Thursday that the
execution would be livestreamed and that more details would follow.
The revelation from Hegseth about the public nature of the execution —
let alone one as violent as a firing squad — has raised further
questions about how the death penalty is carried out in the U.S.,
especially after the botched lethal injection of Christa Pike in
Tennessee.
Experts offer mixed reactions on the plan
Hasan could choose to resist execution and file a habeas petition — a
legal request to review the legality of a detention — in civilian court,
which could significantly delay the execution, experts said.
“It frankly might outlast the current administration, and who knows if
the next one will have the same penchant for executions,” said Eugene R.
Fidell, a visiting lecturer at Yale Law School specializing in military
law.
Deborah Denno, a death penalty expert and law professor at Fordham
University, said livestreaming an execution could make the process “much
more transparent” and inform the public about all that capital
punishment entails. Those are benefits that she said would be useful at
a time when Pike's botched execution has raised fresh questions about
the manner by which criminal defendants are put to death for their
crimes.
“I think it could possibly be a good idea because it would be
transparent and the public would be fully aware that it’s happening,”
she said.
When many states have had difficulty carrying out lethal injections due
to difficulty accessing drugs or finding medical professionals willing
to participate in executions, firing squads are coming to be seen as a
less inhumane alternative, said Brenner Fissell, a professor at
Villanova Law and vice president of the National Institute of Military
Justice.
“Firing squads can be a quicker, cleaner, more precise way to execute a
prisoner,” he said. “I don’t think that’s what’s motivating this.
There’s a perceived masculinity and military-ness to firing squads that
is part of the aura Hegseth is trying to emphasize — the ‘lethality
culture.’”
Elisabeth Semel, co-director of the Death Penalty Clinic at UC Berkeley
Law, said Hegseth’s announcement raises a host of legal and public
policy questions, including concerns for the dignity of the defendant,
who will be eligible to view the execution and what the Trump
administration has in mind in opting for an unusual spectacle.
Though there has been long-running discussion about the idea of
televising an execution, “I don’t recall a situation in which it was
instigated by the government. I think that also raises serious questions
about what is the motivation of the government,” she said.
“This is a president who’s about spectacle and that’s, I think,
precisely the message that he intends to deliver,” Semel said, adding
that she was skeptical that the administration had given a second
thought to the legal and social questions being presented by the
decision.
Trump has spoken out against public executions in Iran
Trump, who approved Hasan's execution, has previously been critical of
public executions in Iran, at times using the possibility of protesters
being killed by the Iranian government as a possible rationale for
military action that preceded his ultimate choice to attack Iran on Feb.
28.
“We’ve been told that the killing in Iran is stopping,” Trump told
reporters on Jan. 14. “It’s stopping, and there’s no plan for
executions.”
In his State of the Union address just days before launching the Iran
war, Trump reiterated, “We stopped them from hanging a lot of them with
the threat of serious violence.”
[to top of second column]
|
This undated photo provided by the Bell County Sheriff's Department
shows former Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan. (Bell County
Sheriff's Department via AP, File)
The White House on Thursday referred questions about the plans for
the livestreamed execution to the Pentagon.
Hegseth was asked Wednesday if Hasan had made any final requests or
reached out to the Trump administration. The Pentagon chief replied:
“Don’t care. We’ll see him on Dec. 3.”
It's not clear if Hasan will try to appeal
Hasan, an Army psychiatrist who held the rank of major, walked into
a medical building on Nov. 5, 2009, where soldiers were waiting in
long lines to receive immunizations and medical clearance for
deployment. He shouted “Allahu akbar” — Arabic for “God is great!” —
and opened fire with a laser-sighted handgun. He also shot at the
backs of soldiers fleeing toward the parking lot.
Hasan said it was an effort to stop them from going to Afghanistan
and killing his fellow Muslims. A military judge barred him from
presenting that as a defense during his 2013 trial. Hasan was left
paralyzed from the waist down after being shot in the back by law
enforcement, and he now uses a wheelchair.
Hasan could seek a lengthy delay of his execution, though given his
behavior at trial, he may not want to.
After firing his lawyers and representing himself, Hasan began his
portion of the trial by telling jurors he was the gunman. He said
little else over the next three weeks, which convinced his
court-appointed standby lawyers that Hasan’s only goal was to get a
death sentence.
The military called nearly 90 witnesses, but Hasan rested his case
without calling a single person to testify in his defense and made
no closing argument. Yet he leaked documents during the trial to
journalists that revealed him telling military mental health workers
that he could “ still be a martyr ” if executed.
Attorney John Galligan, a former military judge who had represented
Hasan in several civil matters following his criminal trial, spoke
with Hasan on Wednesday but is barred from offering much detail
about that conversation. He is not representing Hasan in his
criminal case but said he’s worried about his physical health under
the plan laid out by officials, and that Hasan has not yet had
access to legal counsel.
Galligan said that according to Hasan, the commandant of the
facility brought a chaplain but no attorney from either the Trial
Defense Service or from his civilian defense when he was notified
that Trump had signed off on his execution. Galligan called that a
breach of Army regulations.
A spokeswoman for the Army said Thursday that multiple attempts were
made to contact Trial Defense Service attorneys, saying they made
every reasonable effort and adhered to policy.
“The civilian counsel was not reasonably available to be physically
present for the notification on the 5th,” the spokeswoman said,
adding that counsel was located in Virginia but did not provide a
name.
The spokeswoman also said Hasan has not been kept from contacting
and communicating with his counsel.
Hegseth said the military hasn’t executed a service member by firing
squad since World War II. The last military execution took place on
April 13, 1961, when Army Pvt. John Bennett was executed by hanging.
Amnesty International said in its report on executions in 2025 that
it knew of at least 17 public executions — 11 in Iran and 6 in
Afghanistan.
___
Lauer reported from Philadelphia. Associated Press writers Jonathan
J. Cooper in Phoenix, Josh Boak and Michelle L. Price in Washington,
and Gene Johnson in Seattle contributed to this report.
All contents © copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved |
