6 citizens sue Trump, saying media ban deprives them of news as audience
stakeholders
[October 27, 2026]
By JOCELYN NOVECK
In the increasingly bitter legal standoff between President Donald Trump
and media outlets whose reporting he dislikes, a new and crucial third
party has emerged: citizens who watch and read the news and need it to
do their jobs.
A lawsuit filed Monday on behalf of six such citizens — essentially
representing the wider public audience — argues that it’s not only the
rights of news organizations that are violated when Trump bans them from
White House premises. Even more fundamentally, the lawsuit argues, such
bans violate the public’s right to independent reporting about its
president and government.
“The ultimate injury here … is to the democratic public,” says the suit,
filed in federal district court in New York against Trump and three key
aides, including the White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles.
“The First Amendment protects the public’s right to know what its
government is doing,” said Katie Fallow, deputy litigation director at
the Knight First Amendment Institute, which filed the lawsuit on behalf
of the plaintiffs, along with the Media Freedom & Information Access
Clinic at Yale Law School.
“The White House cannot decide what information Americans receive by
punishing critical reporting," Fallow said in a statement. "When the
White House expels reporters because of their coverage and threatens
others with expulsion, it isn’t just the press that suffers — the public
loses access to independent reporting and gets something closer to
government propaganda.”
The Trump administration, asked for comment on the lawsuit, responded in
a statement that it attributed to an unidentified White House official:
“No person may demand access to the Oval Office.” It said media that
peddle “misinformation and defamation are completely capable of
reporting their manufactured stories from directly outside.”
The plaintiffs all rely on White House news for their work
The six plaintiffs are all people who say they rely on independent and
diverse White House reporting for their teaching, journalism or
advocacy. They include a noted human rights advocate, a political
journalist, a Yale history professor, a high school civics teacher, a
legal journalist, and a student journalist at the University of
Pennsylvania.
The complaint filed Monday recounts how various news organizations that
have been targeted by Trump are already battling the administration in
the courts. These cases include the current lawsuit by CNN, MS NOW and
Politico, whose journalists were banished from the White House in
September.
A federal judge recently extended an order preventing the White House
from enforcing the ban while the case makes its way through the legal
system. Still affected, though, is CNN’s pool coverage of Trump. The
White House has been denying the network its usual slots in the video
pool covering the president’s activities and travel, and CNN has
threatened further action.
Also continuing is the legal case involving The Associated Press, whose
reporters were barred last year from the Oval Office, Air Force One and
some events in retaliation for the outlet’s decision not to follow
Trump’s lead in changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico, which lies
partially in Mexican and other waters, to the Gulf of America.
The New York Times is also involved in litigation, over a Pentagon
policy requiring escorts for journalists on its grounds. And ABC is
fighting back against the Trump administration in a dispute over renewal
of its broadcast licenses.
This lawsuit seeks more wide-ranging relief
The new lawsuit filed Monday, though, is different from previous legal
action against the president — first, in that the plaintiffs are
ordinary citizens, shifting the focus from news gatherers to news
consumers, and thus implying a much larger pool of stakeholders.
The lawsuit reframes the current debate over White House access in at
least one key way. The public right to receive information is part of
established law, said Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight
Institute. However, nobody has yet asserted this right in relation to
the White House press corps and the issues currently at stake.
[to top of second column]
|
“We wanted to put the injury to the public at the center of the
conversation,” Jaffer said.
“It’s one thing for CNN to say, ‘We are here because the public
needs us,’” he said. “It’s another for a member of the public to say
that interference with the White House press corps undermines our
right to information about the government.”
In addition, the litigation seeks more wide-ranging relief.
The suit, which names Trump as defendant along with Wiles, White
House Communications Director Steven Cheung and Secret Service
Director Sean M. Curran, calls not merely for reinstatement of
access that has already been impacted, but for a broad injunction
that would protect from retaliation every news outlet that covers
the White House —- now, and in the future.
“Defendants' policy of restricting the access of disfavored news
organizations deprives the public of the reporting of those
organizations," the complaint says. It also "inevitably deprives
them of the independent reporting of other news organizations as
well, since every journalist who reports from the White House must
now account for the possibility that a critical or ill-advised word
about the president may result in their access being summarily
restricted or revoked."
“Plaintiffs ... seek a declaration that the policy is
unconstitutional because it imposes restrictions on a limited public
forum that are viewpoint-based and unreasonable," the complaint
adds. "They also seek an injunction barring defendants from
enforcing the policy.”
Plaintiffs include a human rights advocate, a high school teacher
and a student journalist
Plaintiff Ethan Young, a student at the University of Pennsylvania
and editor-in-chief of The Daily Pennsylvanian, said in an interview
that White House reporting has become increasingly important at his
college newspaper during Trump’s second term.
“Over the last two years we’ve seen college campuses be a key avenue
where President Trump’s policies have really affected people across
the country, and Penn’s campus is no stranger to that,” he said.
“So I use White House reporting almost daily to look at what’s
happening in both national higher education trends, but also just
general federal policy changes, to see what might impact Penn,”
Young said. “You never know what policy could have an impact on the
Penn student body.”
Especially important to Young and his colleagues at the paper is a
diversity of news outlets to choose from.
“We are not in the room. We are not in Washington,” Young said. “The
benefit of having access to a variety of publications ... means I am
constantly seeing different questions being asked of White House
officials.”
And more often than not, he said, that means he’ll get the answer to
a question he has, too.
The other plaintiffs are:
— Kenneth Roth, former longtime executive director of Human Rights
Watch and a lecturer at Yale’s law school and school of global
affairs.
— Daniel Froomkin, media and political journalist and editor of
Press Watch, a nonprofit that encourages political journalists to
“fulfill their essential mission of creating an informed electorate
and holding the powerful accountable.”
— Beverly Gage, Pulitzer Prize-winning historian and professor at
Yale University.
— Peter Schmidt-Nowara, a social studies and civics teacher at
Brooklyn Technical High School in New York.
— Benjamin Wittes, editor-in-chief of Lawfare and a senior fellow at
the Brookings Institution.
All contents © copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 |
