House passes $70B bill to fund immigration enforcement for 3 years,
sending to Trump
[June 10, 2026]
By KEVIN FREKING and LISA MASCARO
WASHINGTON (AP) — A bill to provide nearly $70 billion for immigration
enforcement narrowly passed the House on Tuesday and now goes to
President Donald Trump for his signature, bolstering the
administration’s deportation agenda for the remainder of his time in the
White House.
Republicans used their majority to get the bill over the finish line,
funding a pair of Homeland Security agencies through the next three
years. The bill passed by a vote of 214-212, over the objections of
Democrats. Trump is expected to sign it into law on Wednesday.
The White House says the bill will provide $38 billion for Immigration
and Customs Enforcement, $26 billion for the Border Patrol and another
$5 billion to cover unforeseen costs. It frontloads routine annual
funding, ensuring a virtually uninterrupted flow of money as the Trump
administration seeks to deport some 1 million people per year.
Speaker Mike Johnson needed near-perfect attendance and unity on his
side to complete weeks of action. The legislation got sidetracked over
$1 billion for White House security, including for Trump’s new ballroom,
and a $1.8 billion fund to compensate his allies who claim they have
been unjustly investigated and prosecuted. Those proposals proved
politically toxic and were scrapped.
Now, the bill is focused entirely on immigration enforcement, a topic
that Republicans have treated as a defining issue between the two major
political parties and one they hope will carry them to victory in this
year's midterm elections.
“It's long overdue,” said Johnson, R-La., of the bill. “We have to fund
border security and immigration enforcement, and it's sad that
Republicans have to do it on our own.”
But Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas called it a “slush fund for
ICE.”
Funding accelerates Trump's deportation agenda
The funding comes on top of the nearly $140 billion that the
Republican-controlled Congress gave ICE and Customs and Border
Protection last year as part of Trump's tax and spending cuts bill.
Democrats objected to giving the agencies more money without significant
changes in the way they operate after the deaths of Alex Pretti and
Renee Good in Minneapolis. For example, Democrats insisted that agents
remove masks and be required to display their ID badges during
enforcement operations and that they get a judicial warrant before
entering private property. Instead, the funding will come with virtually
no strings attached.
Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said Republicans weren't
focused on the top priorities of the American people and have cut access
to Medicaid and nutrition assistance through Trump's earlier tax and
spending cut bill.
“Republicans have now come back for more, to give ICE and Donald Trump's
violent mass deportation machine another $70 billion blank check, with
no oversight, no accountability and no guardrails,” Jeffries said.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise countered that Democrats were not
adequately supportive of law enforcement.
“Make no mistake, if you're voting yes, you're not only voting to secure
America's border, you're voting to fund law enforcement,” Scalise said.
“And if you vote no, you are voting to defund the police.”
Homeland Security faced the longest shutdown in history
The package is the result of a monthslong standoff in Congress after
Democrats refused to fund the Department of Homeland Security in the
wake of the immigration enforcement actions in Minneapolis and other
American cities, leading to the longest shutdown in agency history.
[to top of second column]
|
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin testifies before the
House Committee on Homeland Security during a hearing on the Fiscal
2027 budget request for the Department of Homeland Security, in
Washington, Wednesday, June 3, 2026. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)
Negotiations had been underway with the White House to alter ICE
operations as Democrats were demanding. When those negotiations
failed, Republicans turned to a complicated procedural maneuver to
get around the filibuster and pass the immigration funding with no
Democratic votes.
Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the chairman of the Budget Committee,
said the money would provide “regular, normal funding” that ICE and
the Border Patrol would get through the annual budgeting process.
“And we’re going to do it, not for one year, but for three years, so
we don’t end up here again.”
The Senate completed its work on the legislation last week during an
overnight session on a nearly party-line vote, with Sen. Lisa
Murkowski of Alaska the only Republican to oppose it.
Money comes at a pivotal time for Trump's immigration agenda
The money will come at a pivotal time for the Department of Homeland
Security, which is under new leadership after Trump replaced Kristi
Noem with new Secretary Markwayne Mullin in March.
While Mullin has vowed to keep the department out of the headlines,
the administration is under pressure from anti-immigration advocates
to deliver on Trump’s campaign promise of the largest deportation
operation in American history.
At the same time, the administration is making it more difficult for
certain legal immigrants to remain in the U.S. with Temporary
Protective Status or to obtain green cards.
Lawmakers clash over DHS priorities
On the House side, Johnson had little margin for error. Rep. Kevin
Kiley, I-Calif., ended up siding with Democrats on the party-line
vote.
Leading up to the vote, Democrats portrayed DHS as an agency that
has used its new resources to buy private jets for its leadership,
warehouse immigrants in deplorable conditions and attack U.S.
citizens.
“Republican leadership likes to talk a lot about common sense, but
where is the common sense in giving this federal agency essentially
unlimited funds without a single reform in place?” asked Rep. Pete
Aguilar, chair of the House Democratic Caucus.
Republicans countered that they were fulfilling their duty to
safeguard the nation and support the men and women charged with
enforcing the law.
“Democrats can say whatever they want, but what it’s about is public
safety. What’s it about is keeping Americans safe,” said Rep.
Michelle Fischbach, R-Minn.
All contents © copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 |
