What would have been the most restrictive abortion bill in the US stalls
in South Carolina
[November 19, 2025]
By JEFFREY COLLINS
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — A South Carolina bill that would allow judges to
sentence women who get abortions to decades in prison and could restrict
the use of IUDs and in vitro fertilization has stalled after failing to
get out a legislative subcommittee Tuesday.
Four of the six Republicans on the subcommittee refused to vote on the
bill, which would ban all abortions unless the woman’s life is
threatened. The three Democrats were then able to vote against sending
the bill forward.
The proposal is not dead, but the effort did reveal a lack of support
for the most extreme positions among groups opposing abortions. If the
bill had been sent to the full Medical Affairs Committee, it would have
gone further than any other such proposal across the U.S. since the
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
In declining to vote on the bill, Republican state Sen. Jeff Zell said
he wants to stop as many abortions as possible but that most people
aren't interested in such extreme positions. He said other issues are
more important to South Carolina residents.
“Say what you want. Play your politics. I'm not interested in that. What
I'm interested in is speaking on behalf of South Carolinians and they're
not interested in this bill right now,” Zell said.
South Carolina already bans abortions after cardiac activity is
detected, which is typically six week into a pregnancy, before many
women know they are pregnant. The state allows abortions for rape and
incest victims up to 12 weeks.
Tuesday’s vote came after two failed attempts to either lessen or
eliminate a proposal in the bill to punish a woman who gets an abortion
and anyone who helps them with up to 30 years in prison. An attempt to
remove a provision making it a crime to tell someone where they could
obtain an abortion or taking them someplace where the procedure is legal
also failed.
The bill also appeared to ban any contraception that prevents a
fertilized egg from implanting, which would ban intrauterine devices and
could limit in vitro fertilization.
[to top of second column]
|
Over two dozen abortion rights supporters attend a rally outside the
South Carolina State House in Columbia, S.C., on Aug. 23, 2023. (AP
Photo/James Pollard, file)
 Providing information about
abortions would be illegal, leaving doctors worried they couldn’t
suggest places where the procedure is legal.
Republican Sen. Richard Cash, who sponsored the bill and is one of
the Senate’s most strident voices against abortion, wanted to keep
the criminal penalties.
He said that before Roe v. Wade was overturned, abortion opponents
did not consider all the ramifications of banning abortion, like how
to treat embryos.
“We never even thought about it. And now we do,” Cash said.
Abortion remains an unsettled issue in conservative states and
anti-abortion groups are divided over how much more to restrict it.
South Carolina Citizens for Life, one of the state’s largest and
oldest opponents of abortion, issued a statement last month saying
it can’t support Cash's bill because women who get abortions are
victims too and shouldn’t be punished.
On the other side, at least for this bill, are groups like Equal
Protection South Carolina. “Abortion is murder and should be treated
as such,” founder Mark Corral said.
Democratic Sen. Brad Hutto said he is glad this bill isn't advancing
because it had so many bad components. But he expects abortion to be
an issue again when the regular General Assembly session starts in
2026.
“I say, if it's January, there's an abortion bill,” Hutto said.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 |
