State Department website posts article on
Trump's Florida resort
Send a link to a friend
[April 25, 2017]
By Yeganeh Torbati
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. State
Department website on Monday took down an article it published this
month about President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort which had
prompted criticism from prominent ethics experts that the piece
represented use of public office for private gain.
The original article was posted on April 4 on the "Share America"
website, overseen by the State Department's Bureau of International
Information Programs. It was also shared on the websites and social
media pages of several U.S. embassies, including those in the United
Kingdom, Portugal and Albania, as well as the State Department's Bureau
of Economic and Business Affairs.
Although it was posted weeks ago, the article surfaced on Monday when it
was shared widely on social media.
The State Department removed the article's content around 7 p.m. on
Monday, replacing it with a short statement saying its intention "was to
inform the public about where the President has been hosting world
leaders. We regret any misperception and have removed the post."
The article described the history of Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm
Beach, Florida, and its size, status as a registered historic site,
interior decoration and oceanfront location.
"By visiting this 'winter White House,' Trump is belatedly fulfilling
the dream of Mar-a-Lago's original owner and designer," socialite and
cereal heiress Marjorie Merriweather Post, the article said. "Post's
dream of a winter White House came true with Trump's election in 2016."
A White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the
White House did not know about the article in advance, and declined to
Norman Eisen, ethics chief under Trump's predecessor, Democratic
President Barack Obama, said on Twitter that the article violated a
federal statute barring the use of public office for private gain.
Richard Painter, a former ethics lawyer for Republican President George
W. Bush, said on Twitter that the post constituted "use of public office
for private gain pure and simple."
Scott Amey, an attorney with the nonpartisan Project on Government
Oversight, said the post may not be an outright endorsement of
Mar-a-Lago, but that "someone inside of the government should have said
'no' to the story and further helping Trump make money while serving in
the White House."
[to top of second column]
The Mar-a-Lago estate is shown before U.S. President-elect Donald
Trump departed with his family for New York, after spending the
Thanksgiving holiday with family, in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.,
November 27, 2016. REUTERS/Joe Skipper/File Photo
The "Share America" article said that in 1973, Post willed the
estate to the U.S. government, intending it to be used as a winter
White House for the president to entertain foreign dignitaries.
But Presidents Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter never used the
property, and in 1981 the government returned the estate to the Post
Foundation because it was costing too much to maintain, according to
Trump, a businessman turned politician, bought the property in 1985,
and turned it into a club open to dues-paying members 10 years
later, it said.
The club has a $200,000 membership fee, and Trump has hosted Chinese
President Xi Jinping and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the
resort. Trump's frequent visits there have come under scrutiny due
to their expense and questions of how he has handled sensitive
national security information while there.
Trump maintains ownership of his global business empire, though he
has handed off control to his two oldest sons, an arrangement that
ethics watchdogs said would not prevent conflicts of interest.
(Additional reporting by Lesley Wroughton and Steve Holland in
Washington; editing by Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.