FBI seeks interviews with Democrats who urged US troops to defy illegal
orders
[November 26, 2025]
By JOEY CAPPELLETTI and MIKE HOUSEHOLDER
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic lawmakers who appeared in a social media
video urging U.S. troops to defy “illegal orders” say the FBI has
contacted them to begin scheduling interviews, signaling a possible
inquiry into the matter.
It would mark the second investigation tied to the video, coming a day
after the Pentagon said it was reviewing Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of
Arizona over potential violations of military law. The FBI and Pentagon
actions come after President Donald Trump accused the lawmakers of
sedition and said it is “punishable by DEATH” in a social media post.
Together, the inquiries mark an extraordinary escalation for federal law
enforcement and military institutions that traditionally steer clear of
partisan clashes. They also underscore the administration’s willingness
to push legal limits against its critics, even when they are sitting
members of Congress. Lawmakers in the video urge troops to reject any
illegal orders from their superiors, something they are already
duty-bound to do.
“President Trump is using the FBI as a tool to intimidate and harass
Members of Congress,” a group of four Democratic House members said in a
statement Tuesday. “Yesterday, the FBI contacted the House and Senate
Sergeants at Arms requesting interviews.”
Democrats call inquiry a ‘scare tactic’
Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin, one of the six Democratic lawmakers in the
video, told reporters Tuesday that “last night the counterterrorism
division at the FBI sent a note to the members of Congress, saying they
are opening what appears to be an inquiry against the six of us.”
Slotkin called it a “scare tactic by” Trump.
“Whether you agree with the video or don’t agree with the video, the
question to me is: is this the appropriate response for a president of
the United States to go after and seek to weaponize the federal
government against those he disagrees with?” said Slotkin.
The group of four Democratic House members said in their statement that
“no amount of intimidation or harassment will ever stop us from doing
our jobs and honoring our Constitution.”
All six of the Democratic lawmakers in the video have served in the
military or intelligence community.
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska criticized both inquiries on
social media, saying that accusing the lawmakers “of treason and
sedition for rightfully pointing out that servicemembers can refuse
illegal orders is reckless and flat-out wrong.”
“The Department of Defense and FBI surely have more important priorities
than this frivolous investigation,” wrote Murkowski.
FBI provides no insight into interview requests
The FBI went through the top security officials for the House and Senate
to request interviews with each of the six lawmakers. The lawmakers said
they had no further information and the FBI has not made clear on what
basis they were seeking the interviews.
[to top of second column]
|
FBI Director Kash Patel speaks with reporters during a news
conference at the Department of Justice, Wednesday, Nov. 19, 2025,
in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
The FBI declined to comment Tuesday, but Director Kash Patel, in an
interview with journalist Catherine Herridge, described it as an
“ongoing matter” in explaining why he could not discuss details.
Asked for his reaction to the video, Patel said, “What goes through
my head is the same thing that goes through my head in any case: is
there a lawful predicate to open up an inquiry and investigation, or
is there not? And that decision will be made by the career agents
and analysts here at the FBI.”
The video at the heart of the inquiries
In the video, lawmakers said they needed troops to “stand up for our
laws … our Constitution.” Kelly, who was a fighter pilot before
becoming an astronaut and then retiring at the rank of captain, told
troops that “you can refuse illegal orders.”
After the Pentagon announced the investigation into Kelly on Monday,
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth referred it to the Navy on Tuesday
and requested a briefing by Dec. 10.
The lawmakers didn’t mention specific circumstances in the video.
But at an event Tuesday in Michigan, Slotkin pointed to the Trump
administration ordering the military to blow up small boats in the
Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean accused of ferrying drugs
and continued attempts at deploying National Guard troops into U.S.
cities despite some legal setbacks.
“It wasn’t that there was any one incident, it was the sheer number
of people coming to us and saying, ‘I’m worried. I am being sent to
Washington or I’m being sent to LA or Chicago, North Carolina now,
and I’m concerned I’m going to be asked to do something that I don’t
know if I should do,'” said Slotkin. “So that’s where it came from.”
Troops, especially uniformed commanders, do have specific
obligations to reject orders that are unlawful, if they make that
determination.
Broad legal precedence also holds that just following orders —
colloquially known as the “Nuremberg defense,” as it was used
unsuccessfully by senior Nazi officials to justify their actions
under Adolf Hitler — doesn’t absolve troops.
___
Householder reported from Inkster, Michigan. Associated Press writer
Eric Tucker in Washington also contributed to this report.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 |
