Independent candidate blasts election measure
[June 10, 2026]
By Catrina Barker | The Center Square contributor
(The Center Square) – Independent Illinois gubernatorial candidate
Collin Corbett is criticizing a failed election omnibus proposal that he
says would have retroactively loosened petition-circulation requirements
for some Chicago school board candidates, calling the measure an example
of a ballot-access system that is already stacked against independent
and third-party candidates.
Corbett first raised concerns in a social media video near the end of
the General Assembly's spring session, alleging that language in Senate
Amendment 3 to House Bill 1832 would have exempted certain Chicago
school board petition circulators from requirements that other
candidates were required to follow.
"At the behest of the Chicago Teachers Union, a provision is being snuck
through in the election omnibus," Corbett said in the video. He argued
that the proposal would have lifted petition-circulation restrictions
for nonpartisan Chicago school board candidates and applied those
changes retroactively.
In an interview with The Center Square, Corbett said his primary
objection was not only the proposed rule change itself, but that it
would have occurred after candidates had already completed the petition
process.
"We all had to follow a certain set of rules in order to make it on the
ballot," Corbett said. "If you go in and you change it just for a select
group, that takes a rigged system and makes it even more rigged."
Corbett said Illinois law imposes stricter requirements on independent,
third-party and nonpartisan candidates than those faced by Democratic
and Republican candidates, particularly regarding who may circulate
nomination petitions.
"Those rules should be changed because the two parties do not have to
follow those rules when they circulate," Corbett said. "That said, this
election omnibus would have retroactively changed those rules only for
candidates for the Chicago School Board."
Corbett alleged that the measure would have benefited candidates backed
by the Chicago Teachers Union whose petitions may have otherwise faced
legal challenges. He further speculated that either candidates were
aware a legislative fix was forthcoming or failed to comply with
existing requirements and later sought relief through legislation.
[to top of second column]
|
"So, there's only one of two explanations," Corbett said. "Either
these candidates backed by CTU knew that they were going to push
forward a bill at the end of session to allow these circulators to
go through, or they didn't follow the rules, didn't even know the
rules, and now they're just trying to cover their ends and avoid
getting knocked off the ballot."
The proposal ultimately failed to advance before lawmakers
adjourned. Corbett said he hopes public criticism contributed to its
defeat.
"I'm hopeful that it didn't pass because I and many others shined a
spotlight on how bad this is, how unethical this is," he said.
Looking beyond the specific legislation, Corbett argued that
Illinois' ballot-access laws make it difficult for candidates
outside the two major parties to compete.
"The system is rigged against any everyday Illinoisan who wants to
run for office," Corbett said. "Once I make it on the ballot, I'll
be only the third independent candidate for governor in Illinois in
over 80 years."
Corbett attributed those barriers to efforts by the major political
parties to preserve their influence.
"The reason for the rigged system is power and control," he said.
"Neither of the two parties want other candidates, other parties,
independent candidates to be able to run."
Corbett is running for governor as an independent and said his
campaign seeks to offer voters an alternative to what he described
as a dysfunctional two-party system.
"We're running to give an alternative in Illinois, a mainstream,
common-sense movement that focuses on solutions to people's problems
instead of these partisan political games," Corbett said.
|
