Appeals court pauses order restricting use of force by immigration
agents in Chicago-area crackdown
[November 20, 2025]
By SOPHIA TAREEN
CHICAGO (AP) — A federal appeals court on Wednesday temporarily halted
an order restricting the use of force by federal immigration agents in
the Chicago area, calling it “overbroad” and “too prescriptive.”
But the7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also cautioned against
“overreading” its stay and said a quick appeal process could lead to a
“more tailored and appropriate” order.
Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis issued a preliminary
injunction in response to a lawsuit filed by news outlets and protesters
who claimed federal officers used excessive force during an immigration
crackdown that has netted more than 3,000 arrests since September across
the nation’s third-largest city and its many suburbs.
Government attorneys had argued that the order restricted the
enforcement of the nation’s laws and could “subvert” the constitutional
structure.
In issuing a stay Wednesday, the three-judge panel said the government’s
arguments were likely to prevail in court.
“The preliminary injunction entered by the district court is overbroad,”
the two-page ruling said. “In no uncertain terms, the district court’s
order enjoins an expansive range of defendants, including the President
of the United States, the entire Department of Homeland Security and
Justice, and anyone acting in concert with them.”

It added that the order was “too prescriptive" as it specified the types
of riot control weapons and other devices in a way that “resembles a
federal regulation.”
Among other things, Ellis' order restricted agents from using physical
force and chemical agents like tear gas and pepper balls, unless
necessary or to prevent an “an immediate threat.” She said the current
practices violated the constitutional rights of journalists and
protesters.
[to top of second column]
|

Federal immigration enforcement agents detain a protester in the
Little Village neighborhood of Chicago on Oct. 23, 2025. (Anthony
Vazquez/Chicago Sun-Times via AP, File)

During a lengthy court hearing this month, witnesses gave emotional
testimony when describing experiencing tear gas, being shot in the
head with pepper balls while praying, and having guns pointed at
them.
Ellis determined that Trump administration witnesses were “simply
not credible,” including Gregory Bovino, a Border Patrol commander
who led the Chicago area operation before moving on to to North
Carolina in recent days.
In a statement, Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary
Tricia McLaughlin called the stay “a win for the rule of law and for
the safety of every law enforcement officer.”
Attorneys for the plaintiffs did not immediately return a message
seeking comment Wednesday.
Bovino, the head of a Border Patrol sector in El Centro, California,
has repeatedly defended agents’ use of force. He oversaw about 230
agents from U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Chicago area
starting in September. After North Carolina, federal border agents
are expected to be deployed to New Orleans.
The immigration operation in the Chicago area has triggered multiple
lawsuits, including allegations about inhumane conditions at a
federal immigration center. The legal complaint prompted a federal
judge and attorneys to visit the longtime U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement facility outside Chicago last week.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |