Mark Zuckerberg quizzed on kids' Instagram use in social media trial
[February 19, 2026] By
KAITLYN HUAMANI and BARBARA ORTUTAY
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Mark Zuckerberg and opposing lawyers dueled in a Los
Angeles courtroom on Wednesday, where the Meta CEO answered questions
about young people’s use of Instagram, his congressional testimony and
internal advice he’s received about being “authentic” and not “robotic.”
Zuckerberg's testimony is part of an unprecedented social media trial
that questions whether Meta's platforms deliberately addict and harm
children. During questioning by the plaintiff's lawyer, Zuckerberg said
he still agrees with a previous statement he made that the existing body
of scientific work has not proved that social media causes mental health
harms.
The plaintiff’s attorney, Mark Lanier, asked Zuckerberg if people tend
to use something more if it’s addictive.
“I’m not sure what to say to that,” Zuckerberg said. “I don’t think that
applies here.”
Attorneys representing the plaintiff, a now 20-year-old woman identified
by the initials KGM, claim her early use of social media addicted her to
the technology and exacerbated depression and suicidal thoughts. Meta
Platforms and Google’s YouTube are the two remaining defendants in the
case, which TikTok and Snap have settled.
Beginning his questioning, Lanier laid out three options of what people
can do regarding vulnerable people: help them, ignore them, or “prey
upon them and use them for our own ends.” Zuckerberg said he agrees the
last option is not what a reasonable company should do, saying, “I think
a reasonable company should try to help the people that use its
services.”
Lanier questioned the Meta CEO extensively about a comment he made
during a past congressional hearing, where he said Instagram employees
are not given goals to increase amount of time people spent on the
platform.
Lanier presented internal documents that seemed to contradict that
statement. Zuckerberg replied that they previously had goals associated
with time, but said he and the company made the conscious decision to
move away from those goals, focusing instead on utility. He said he
believes in the “basic assumption” that “if something is valuable,
people will use it more because it’s useful to them.”
Lanier also asked Zuckerberg about what he characterized as extensive
media training, including for testimonies like the one he was giving in
court. Lanier pointed to an internal document about feedback on
Zuckerberg's tone of voice on his own social media, imploring him to
come off as “authentic, direct, human, insightful and real,” and
instructing him to not “try hard,” or be "fake, robotic, corporate or
cheesy” in his communication.
Zuckerberg pushed back against the idea that he’s been coached on how to
respond to questions or present himself, saying those offering the
advice were “just giving feedback.”
Regarding his media appearances and public speaking, Zuckerberg said, “I
think I’m actually well known to be sort of bad at this.”
The Meta CEO has long been mocked online for appearing robotic and, when
he was younger, nervous when speaking publicly. In 2010, during an
interview with renowned tech journalists Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg,
he was sweating so profusely that Swisher asked him if he wanted to
“take off the hoodie” that was his uniform at the time.
Lanier spent a considerable stretch of his time with Zuckerberg asking
about the company’s age verification policies.
[to top of second column] |
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg arrives for a landmark trial over whether
social media platforms deliberately addict and harm children,
Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2026, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Ryan Sun)
 “I don’t see why this is so
complicated,” Zuckerberg said after a lengthy back-and-forth,
reiterating that the company’s policy restricts users under the age
of 13 and that they work to detect users who have lied about their
ages to bypass restrictions.
Zuckerberg mostly stuck to his talking points, referencing his goal
of building a platform that is valuable to users and, on multiple
occasions, saying he disagreed with Lanier’s “characterization” of
his questions or of Zuckerberg’s own comments.
As was the case with head of Instagram Adam Mosseri’s testimony last
week, Zuckerberg was grilled about policies relating to cosmetic
beauty filters on Instagram. Zuckerberg said he didn’t believe there
was enough evidence pointing to harm the filters could cause and
said he has a “high bar” for blocking tools or features that would
limit people’s expression. Lanier pointed to external experts Meta
consulted to assess the filters and their potential impacts, saying
that all 18 of them raised concerns.
Children's advocates slammed Zuckerberg's testimony as disingenuous.
“All Mark Zuckerberg accomplished with his testimony today was to
prove yet again that he cannot be trusted, especially when it comes
to kids’ safety," said Josh Golin, executive director of Fairplay.
“Under oath, Meta’s CEO testified that his company does not have an
objective to increase users’ time spent on Instagram. But we know
Zuckerberg and his fellow executives prevented Instagram from
getting rid of features like visible like counts and plastic surgery
filters — features that are by their very nature addictive.”
Zuckerberg has testified in other trials and answered questions from
Congress about youth safety on Meta's platforms. During his 2024
congressional testimony, he apologized to families whose lives had
been upended by tragedies they believed were caused by social media.
But while he told parents he was “sorry for everything you have all
been through,” he stopped short of taking direct responsibility for
it. This trial marks the first time Zuckerberg stands before a jury.
Once again, bereaved parents are sitting in the courtroom audience.
The case, along with two others, has been selected as a bellwether
trial, meaning its outcome could impact how thousands of similar
lawsuits against social media companies are likely to play out.
One of Meta's attorneys, Paul Schmidt, said in his opening statement
that the company is not disputing that KGM experienced mental health
struggles, but rather disputing that Instagram played a substantial
factor in those struggles. He pointed to medical records that showed
a turbulent home life, and both he and an attorney representing
YouTube argue she turned to their platforms as a coping mechanism or
a means of escaping her mental health struggles.
Meta is also facing a separate trial in New Mexico that began last
week.
All contents © copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved |
