A grim job outlook meets a scrappy workforce as administrative
assistants harness AI
[July 02, 2026] By
CLAIRE SAVAGE
With their numbers already in decline, secretaries and administrative
assistants face another growing threat: artificial intelligence tools
like ChatGPT and Claude that can accomplish aspects of their workload
with a tap.
Employment projection data offers a grim outlook for the women-dominated
profession that may be particularly vulnerable to AI-induced job
displacement compared to the broader workforce. But some admins are
embracing the technology — and even using it as a tool to get ahead.
Deanna Danger, 43, has worked in an administrative role since 2003. She
says adapting and staying ahead of the curve is a key part of her
constantly-changing role, and AI is no exception.
“All you do is have to evolve,” she says.
Danger started using AI professionally in 2022, learning through
experimentation and collaboration with fellow admins. Today, she no
longer takes notes during meetings — she's set up Copilot and ChatGPT to
do it for her. That has freed her to “actually participate in the
meetings, and not just worry about making sure I typed everything out
that was said,” says Danger, executive assistant to the chief
information officer at Vanderbilt University. “Honestly, what used to
take me hours I’m now done with in under five minutes.”

How — and to what extent — AI might reshape her profession remains to be
seen, but jobs for administrative assistants and secretaries have been
dwindling for decades. In 2004, about 3.5 million people worked in the
role — nearly 97% of them women, according to Current Population Survey
data. Twenty years later, that number slid to 2.1 million — despite
overall workforce growth during the same period.
And except for medical secretaries and administrative assistants — a
category projected to grow 4% by 2034 thanks to growth of the healthcare
industry — economists at the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics predict a
continued decline in the profession.
“The overall story in office and admin occupations from the projection
standpoint for the last several cycles has been one of
productivity-enhancing technologies, limiting demand for employment,”
said Emily Rolen, lead economist for the division of employment
projections at the BLS. Technological advances — word processing,
speech-to-text transcription, scheduling tools and apps — each
transformed the duties of administrative professionals and contributed
to overall decline.
Clerical and administrative workers may be more exposed to AI-induced
job displacement than other professionals because they “lack adaptive
capacity due to limited savings, advanced age, scarce local
opportunities, and/or narrow skill sets," according to a Brookings
Institution report published in January. About 86% of these 6 million
workers are women.
Indeed, more secretaries and administrative assistants are 55 and older
compared to the workforce at large (34% vs. 23%), median pay is lower
than that of all U.S. workers ($47,460 vs. $49,500), and a high school
diploma is sufficient for many entry-level roles.
But what labor data doesn't capture — as noted by the Brookings report —
is an individual’s ability to navigate a changing environment, including
administrative assistants like Danger, who say they “are way more
capable than people think.”
Danger hosts a biweekly virtual coffee chat for peers through the
American Society of Administrative Professionals, a professional group
that says it serves about 132,000 members. Participants in a May session
shared their AI use cases: creating flyers, scouting out restaurants for
executive events, coming up with captions for employer social media
accounts, drafting standard operating procedure language, and more.
[to top of second column] |
 But despite the overall atmosphere
of enthusiasm, some participants raised concerns, including data
security and the lack of AI regulation. Others emphasized that AI
cannot, and will not, replace the emotional intelligence and
relationship building skills that are hallmarks of a successful
admin.
Fiona Young, founder of Carve, a business focused
on training executive assistants on AI, says she has seen “a massive
shift in demand" for her services since 2023. Young, a former
executive assistant herself, says she has delivered AI training to
administrative professionals globally, including at Google, Amazon,
Uber, Salesforce and LinkedIn. In her experience, employers want
staff to be able to leverage AI — “not just loosely understanding
it, but genuinely using it as an integral part of how people are
working every day,” she says.
Oana Manolache takes an even stronger stance. The founder and CEO of
Sequel.io, a platform that enables companies to host webinars on
their own websites, wrote in a LinkedIn post last year: “I will fire
anyone who doesn’t use AI.”
But even Manolache says AI could not replace her executive
assistant, Stephanie Martinez.
Manolache says Martinez uses AI to “free herself” from tasks like
note-taking and meeting prep to focus on the “human work” of
building team connectivity, making judgment calls, understanding
executives' relationships with stakeholders and communicating
accordingly.
Maybe AI could supplant the “traditional” assistant, but “it doesn’t
replace what an executive assistant does now as the role has
evolved,” Manolache says.
Martinez works remotely from El Salvador through Viva Talent, which
— in another example of the shifting landscape for the role — trains
and matches assistants from Latin and South America to primarily
U.S.-based tech companies.
“The people who truly want to succeed in this role have a massive
opportunity," Manolache says. “This person has access to information
across the entire organization.”
For instance, when the company aimed to drive more customer reviews
on a software review platform, Martinez, who manages most invoices
and billing, approached the problem innovatively. She leveraged AI
to sift through all customer communications, pinpoint good
candidates for reviews, and draft outreach emails. Without AI, “it
would have taken her so long to do this,” Manolache says, adding
that it also freed up Martinez to “think creatively.”

That freedom to strategically implement AI is just as important as
education and training, since many assistants are interested in
adopting AI but lack the bandwidth to incorporate it, says Melissa
Peoples, an Austin, Texas-based executive assistant coach and former
C-suite executive assistant.
Gender dynamics compound that challenge in an industry dominated by
women who are often paired with male leaders, Peoples says.
“You see those that are early adopters, and are crushing it, and are
partnered with really empowering executives, and can do all of these
things," she says. "And then you see the other side of this, where
literally assistants are being told, ‘You’re not smart enough to be
in the room. Just bring me my coffee.’”
With effective AI training, Peoples says admins can “find their
voice” and “have higher impact so they are protected against what is
going to happen as agentic AI becomes more commonplace and more
easily accessible.”
All contents © copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved |